Evidence and regulation for COVID-19 self-tests

Introduction: The development of new diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 is a strategic component for the prevention and control of COVID-19. To regulate the market for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection self-tests, the regulatory agency issued a resolution that provided for the introduction of self-tests in Brazil. Objective: To perform a comparison between the new technical requirements of antigen self-tests for COVID-19 with data and information available in the literature. Method: This is a systematic literature review to carry out a comparative study between the scientific evidence and the new technical requirements for the commercialization of antigen self-tests for COVID-19 in Brazil. The search was performed in October 2021, and updated in January 2022. Results: Of the 517 studies identified, nine were included. The studies reported adequate sensitivity and specificity results for most self-tests performed in symptomatic people. The studies bring a variety of tests available and one of them was registered for commercialization in Brazil. Based on this outcome, national regulation follows standards that favor the promotion of self-monitoring by the population, which can contribute to a public health policy. Conclusions: The technical requirements contained in the new regulation and at the national level are consistent with the evidence found, which ensures reliability for decision-making by consumers, clinicians and service providers. It is necessary to continue with studies on self-test coverage for new variants, biological material disposal policies and how the use of self-tests can contribute to the role of consumers in health surveillance actions.

Strategies To Assist People With Disabilities During Health Emergencies, Concerning The COVID-19 - Systematic Review

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected thousands of people worldwide. The collapse of health systems led to increased difficulties in accessing health care for people with disabilities. The objective was to define strategies to support the implementation of health care for people with disabilities. Methods. The protocol for the systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021266341). Searches were done in seven databases, using MeSH terms related to COVID-19 and disability, in 2021. We included interventions that addressed health, education and social assistance. Results. Twenty-nine studies were included. A meta-synthesis identified strategies to assist individuals with disabilities: creation of emergency accommodation and protection programs;flexible work arrangements;cash transfer programs;community participation in planning;establishment of support networks;social assistance even in periods of health emergency;teleconsultation services, telerehabilitation and systems that facilitate the use of digital technologies for telemedicine;inclusive guidelines for computer literacy and learning. The main implementation action was comprehensive health care centered on the needs of people with disabilities, with a focus on training community informants, continuing education of health professionals and caregivers for emergency situations, decentralization of care, identification and elimination of barriers to access. Conclusions. Even though the focus was on telehealth and social assistance, achieving comprehensive healthcare requires a range of interventions that together will support the reduction of inequity faced by people with disabilities.

Antigen Diagnostic Tests With Self-Collection Of Biological Material For The Diagnosis Of COVID-19

Introduction. The self-test for COVID-19 has been a widely used strategy in some countries, especially in the context of back to face-toface work and educational activities. However, it is necessary to discuss the accuracy of antigen tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Methods. A systematic review was carried out. The strategy was defined by the researchers using the terms Covid-19 and Selftesting and their respective synonyms, including studies with data collection from 01/01/2021. Searches were carried out on October 20, 2021, in several databases. Results. A total of 504 studies were identified, four of which were included in this review: two self-tests of nasopharyngeal collection antigen compared to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR);a supervised and self-collected anterior nasal smear selftest;and a study that evaluated the performance of six self-collected rapid antigen tests against quantitative RT-PCR (gargle, sputum, and spit). Saliva self-tests were found to have low sensitivity (<45%), while anterior nasal or nasopharyngeal swab self-tests had greater than 80 percent sensitivity. In all self-tests, the specificity was less than 85 percent. The diagnostic accuracy of self-tests for the different SARS-CoV-2 variants was not identified. Conclusions. The use of self-tests as a screening strategy is recommended, being a strategy with a significant impact on the surveillance and control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Further studies are needed to assess: (i) accuracy considering the concern variants, (ii) safety of tests with self-collection of biological material, and (iii) disposal of biological waste.

Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with COVID-19 among pregnant and postpartum women in public and private hospitals in Brazil (preprint)

Introduction Brazil is a country of continental dimensions with a great challenge to ascertain adequate healthcare throughout regions. The country registered increased numbers of maternal deaths and adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women with COVID-19 infection, rising great concern. There is scarce data on findings among public versus private settings. Objective to compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, among admissions in public and private maternity hospitals during a period before vaccination. Study Design Secondary analysis of the REBRACO initiative, a national multicenter cohort study in Brazil, considering pregnant and postpartum women with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infections (from February 2020 to February 2021) in 15 maternity centers (2 private and 13 public facilities). Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics were compared according to the type of hospital care. In addition, clinical, laboratory findings and maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared in both groups. The prevalence ratio (PR) and its 95%CI for each predictor and outcome were calculated. Results Of 559 symptomatic cases tested, 289 confirmed COVID-19 cases were included, with 213 (72.7%) women in public hospitals and 76 (27.3%) women in private hospitals. SARS-CoV-2 infection frequency was not significantly different among groups. Women treated at public hospitals had lower schooling (p < 0.001), and half of them declared that their pregnancy was not planned. There were 13 maternal deaths among women treated at public services and no maternal deaths among pregnant women treated at private hospitals (p-value – 0,024). Pregnant women in public hospitals had higher rates of fever (p-value – 0,041), tachypnea (p-value – 0,003), abnormal laboratory findings in liver enzymes (p-value – 0,005), severe acute respiratory syndrome SARS (p-value 0.014) and their neonates presented more neonatal respiratory distress (p-value – 0,020). Conclusion Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes were worse in the public hospital group with increased rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome and neonatal respiratory distress. The alarming difference between the number of deaths in patients treated in the public and private sector calls attention to the need to better understand the differences in access to health and other delays experienced by patients of different social levels.

Preeclampsia among women with COVID-19 during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes: Results from a national multicenter study on COVID in Brazil, the REBRACO initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of preeclampsia among cases of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and the association between both conditions, in a multicenter cohort of Brazilian women with respiratory symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Ancillary analysis of the Brazilian Network of COVID-19 in Obstetrics (REBRACO) study. We performed a nested case-control analysis selecting all women with COVID-19 and compared outcomes between women with and without PE. MAIN OUTCOMES: Maternal, gestational, and clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes. MEASURES: Prevalence ratio (PR) and its 95%CI for each of the predictors and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 203 women were included: 21 (10.3%) in PE group and 182 (89.7%) in non-PE group. Preeclampsia was not different among women with and without COVID-19 (10.3% vs 13.1%, p-value = 0.41), neither complication such as eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Chronic hypertension (33.4%) (p < 0.01) and obesity (60.0%) (p = 0.03) were the most frequent comorbidities in PE group, and they were significantly more frequent in this group. Women with PE had more cesarean section (RR 5.54 [1.33 - 23.14]) and their neonates were more frequently admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (PR 2.46[1.06 - 5.69]), most likely due to preterm-birth-related complications. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PE among women with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was around 10%; women with COVID-19 and a history of chronic hypertension or obesity are more likely to have preeclampsia. Cesarean section is increased among women with PE and COVID-19, with increased rates of neonatal admission to intensive care units, mostly due to prematurity.

The COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian pregnant and postpartum women: results from the REBRACO prospective cohort study.

Brazil presented a very high number of maternal deaths and evident delays in healthcare. We aimed at evaluating the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated outcomes in the obstetric population. We conducted a prospective cohort study in 15 Brazilian centers including symptomatic pregnant or postpartum women with suspected COVID-19 from Feb/2020 to Feb/2021. Women were followed from suspected infection until the end of pregnancy. We analyzed maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection and SARS, determining unadjusted risk ratios. In total, 729 symptomatic women with suspected COVID-19 were initially included. Among those investigated for COVID-19, 51.3% (n = 289) were confirmed COVID-19 and 48% (n = 270) were negative. Initially (before May 15th), only 52.9% of the suspected cases were tested and it was the period with the highest proportion of ICU admission and maternal deaths. Non-white ethnicity (RR 1.78 [1.04-3.04]), primary schooling or less (RR 2.16 [1.21-3.87]), being overweight (RR 4.34 [1.04-19.01]) or obese (RR 6.55 [1.57-27.37]), having public prenatal care (RR 2.16 [1.01-4.68]), planned pregnancies (RR 2.09 [1.15-3.78]), onset of infection in postpartum period (RR 6.00 [1.37-26.26]), chronic hypertension (RR 2.15 [1.37-4.10]), pre-existing diabetes (RR 3.20 [1.37-7.46]), asthma (RR 2.22 [1.14-4.34]), and anaemia (RR 3.15 [1.14-8.71]) were associated with higher risk for SARS. The availability of tests and maternal outcomes varied throughout the pandemic period of the study; the beginning was the most challenging period, with worse outcomes. Socially vulnerable, postpartum and previously ill women were more likely to present SARS related to COVID-19.

Long-Term Comparison of 7 SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays in the North Zealand Covid-19 Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic numerous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody assays have been approved through Emergency Use Authorization and require further evaluation of sensitivity and specificity in clinical laboratory settings prior to implementation. METHODS: We included 1733 samples from 375 PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals of the North Zealand Covid-19 Cohort in an 8-month period. We investigated diagnostic sensitivity and specificity against consensus and PCR and interassay agreement over time for 5 SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays [Roche-nucleocapsid (NC)-total, Roche-receptor binding domain (RBD)-total, Siemens-RBD-IgG, Siemens-RBD-total, Thermo Fisher Scientific (TFS)-RBD-IgG] commercially available on automated platforms and 2 ELISA assays (TFS-RBD-total, Wantai-RBD-total). RESULTS: Early interassay discrepancy in up to 49% of samples decreased steadily during the first 18 days. By day 18, all assays had reached a plateau between 82.3% and 90.5% seropositivity compared to PCR. Assays ranked by closest agreement with the consensus model beyond day 18 (sensitivity/specificity against consensus) were as follows: Roche-RBD-total, 99.8%/100.0%; Wantai-RBD-total, 99.8%/99.7%; Roche-NC-total, 97.8%/100.0%; Siemens-RBD-total, 98.0%/98.7%; TFS-RBD-total, 96.9%/99.7%; TFS-RBD-IgG, 91.5%/100.0%; and Siemens-RBD-IgG, 94.6%/89.9%. We found that 7.8% of PCR-positive patients remained seronegative in all assays throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: All included assays had sensitivities against consensus >90% past day 18. For the current recommended use of antibody assays to detect former, undocumented Covid-19, our data suggest the use of total antibody assays rather than IgG-specific assays due to higher long-term sensitivity. Finally, a nonresponding subpopulation of 7.8% in our cohort with persistent seronegative results raises concern of a possible substantial number of people with continued low protection following natural SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Brazilian network of COVID-19 during pregnancy (REBRACO: a multicentre study protocol).

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, epidemiological and laboratory aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and postpartum in 16 maternity hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective multicentre study, with five axes. First, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among women admitted for childbirth will be described in a cross-sectional study. Second, maternal and perinatal outcomes will be assessed in a prospective cohort study including pregnant or postpartum women with suspected COVID-19. Third, a cohort of positive COVID-19 cases with sampling of a variety of biological material. Histopathological and viral analysis of biological maternal and neonatal samples will be performed, and the assessment of nutritional variables to evaluate the association between vitamin D and severity of infection. Fourth, a monitoring and evaluation committee to collect relevant healthcare information and plan actions in centres facing the pandemic. Furthermore, qualitative studies will be performed to study pregnant women, their families and health professionals. Fifth, an ecological study will monitor the number of live births, stillbirths and other outcomes to explore any trend among the periods before, during and after the pandemic. Data will systematically be collected in an electronic platform following standardised operational procedures. For quantitative study components, an appropriate statistical approach will be used for each analysis. For qualitative data, in-depth interviews recorded in audio will be transcribed, checking the text obtained with the recording. Subsequently, thematic analysis with the aid of the NVivo programme will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained (letters of approval numbers 4.047.168, 4.179.679 and 4.083.988). All women will be fully informed to sign the consent form before enrolment in the study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.

Facing the COVID-19 pandemic inside maternities in Brazil: A mixed-method study within the REBRACO initiative.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic posed major challenges in obstetric health care services. Preparedness, development, and implementation of new protocols were part of the needed response. This study aims to describe the strategies implemented and the perspectives of health managers on the challenges to face the pandemic in 16 different maternity hospitals that comprise a multicenter study in Brazil, called REBRACO (Brazilian network of COVID-19 during pregnancy). METHODS: Mixed-method study, with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative data on the infrastructure of the units, maternal and perinatal health indicators, modifications on staff and human resources, from January to July/2020. Also, information on total number of cases, and availability for COVID-19 testing. A qualitative study by purposeful and saturation sampling was undertaken with healthcare managers, to understand perspectives on local challenges in facing the pandemic. RESULTS: Most maternities early implemented their contingency plan. REBRACO centers reported 338 confirmed COVID-19 cases among pregnant and post-partum women up to July 2020. There were 29 maternal deaths and 15 (51.8%) attributed to COVID-19. All maternities performed relocation of beds designated to labor ward, most (75%) acquired mechanical ventilators, only the minority (25%) installed new negative air pressure rooms. Considering human resources, around 40% hired extra health professionals and increased weekly workload and the majority (68.7%) also suspended annual leaves. Only one center implemented universal screening for childbirth and 6 (37.5%) implemented COVID-19 testing for all suspected cases, while around 60% of the centers only tested moderate/severe cases with hospital admission. Qualitative results showed that main challenges experienced were related to the fear of the virus, concerns about reliability of evidence and lack of resources, with a clear need for mental health support among health professionals. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that maternities of the REBRACO initiative underwent major changes in facing the pandemic, with limitations on testing, difficulties in infrastructure and human resources. Leadership, continuous training, implementation of evidence-based protocols and collaborative initiatives are key to transpose the fear of the virus and ascertain adequate healthcare inside maternities, especially in low and middle-income settings. Policy makers need to address the specificities in considering reproductive health and childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic and prioritize research and timely testing availability.

Zoonosis: la cara oculta de la pandemia COVID-19

Las zoonosis son enfermedades que se transmiten de forma natural entre los animales y el hombre. Su interés es enorme y creciente, especialmente en los últimos años en los que han emergido como problemas de gravedad y gran difusión, como zoonosis emergentes. Las zoonosis representan, al menos, el 60% de las enfermedades infecciosas humanas y hasta el 75% de las enfermedades emergentes, por lo que su importancia relativa esta sobradamente justificada. Desde el punto de vista sanitario son causa de muerte, enfermedad, sufrimiento y secuelas y, desde el punto de vista económico, causan quebranto en las naciones o, en todo el mundo, cuando la extensión de la enfermedad es global. El artículo discute cuestiones relativas a la predicción, prevención y control de zoonosis y se fija de modo particular, por su actualidad, en la COVID-19, una pandemia que tiene la condición de zoonosis al admitirse su origen en murciélagos con la intervención probable de un hospedador intermediario. Es importante la unión de fuerzas entre la sanidad animal, la salud humana y la sanidad ambiental, en el contexto de Una sola Salud, para lograr el éxito en el control y erradicación de estas enfermedades.

Serum levels of ACE2 are higher in patients with obesity and diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: As severity of outcome in COVID-19 is disproportionately higher among individuals with obesity, smokers, patients with hypertension, kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease (CHD), and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D), serum levels of ACE2, the cellular entry point for the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, were examined in these high-risk groups. METHODS: Associations of ACE2 levels to smokers and patients with hypertension, T2D, obesity, CHD, or COPD were investigated in a single center population-based study of 5457 Icelanders from the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility Reykjavík Study (AGES-RS) of the elderly (mean age 75 ± 6 years), using multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Serum levels of ACE2 were higher in smokers and individuals with T2D and/or obesity while they were unaffected in the other patient groups. CONCLUSION: ACE2 levels are higher in some patient groups with comorbidities linked to COVID-19 including obesity and T2D and as such may have an emerging role as a circulating biomarker for severity of outcome in the disease.

ACE2 levels are altered in comorbidities linked to severe outcome in COVID-19 (preprint)

Aims: Severity of outcome in COVID-19 is disproportionately higher among the obese, males, smokers, those suffering from hypertension, kidney disease, coronary heart disease (CHD) and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D). We examined if serum levels of ACE2, the cellular entry point for the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, were altered in these high-risk groups. Methods: Associations of serum ACE2 levels to hypertension, T2D, obesity, CHD, smokers and males in a single center population-based study of 5457 Icelanders from the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility Reykjavik Study (AGES-RS) of the elderly (mean age 75+/-6 years). Results: Smokers, males, and individuals with T2D or obesity have altered serum levels of ACE2 that may influence productive infection of SARS-CoV-2 in these high-risk groups. Conclusion: ACE2 levels are upregulated in some patient groups with comorbidities linked to COVID-19 and as such may have an emerging role as a circulating biomarker for severity of outcome in COVID-19.

Antihypertensive medication uses and serum ACE2 levels (preprint)

Importance Recent reports have shown that hypertension is the most common comorbidity associated with mortality in the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This has been related to the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) as animal studies indicate that these medications increase levels of ACE2, the cellular entry point for the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. This has prompted clinicians to recommend discontinuing ACEIs and ARBs. Objective To examine the effect of ACEIs or ARBs treatment on serum levels of ACE2 and other key enzymes in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Design, Setting, and Participants A single center population-based study of 5457 Icelanders from the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility Reykjavik Study (AGES-RS) of the elderly (mean age 75+/-6 years) stratified by ACEIs (N = 699) or ARBs (N = 753) treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures The AGES-RS study population was stratified by ACEIs and ARBs medication use and compared for age, body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), hypertension and type 2 diabetes (T2D) as well as serum levels of renin, ACE and ACE2. Results While renin and ACE levels were significantly raised in serum of individuals on ACEIs or ARBs treatments, the ACE2 levels remained unaffected. Conclusions and Relevance Treatment with ACEIs or ARBs does not raise ACE2 levels in serum. Therefore, the present study does not support the proposed discontinuation of these medications among patients affected with COVID-19.